Select Page

Faculty senate shoots down concealed carry

Faculty senate shoots down concealed carry

FGCU faculty senate voted once again against concealed carry on campus Friday, Oct. 2.

Last year, the issue was discussed in faculty senate and it was shot down, as well. This year, the issue was discussed again because of the U.S. House of Representatives Bill 4005 and Senate Bill 176. These bills propose concealed carry of firearms on college campuses.

Sandra Pavelka, vice president of faculty senate, facilitated the discussion during the meeting and said the group has had a long-standing opposing position regarding concealed weapons on campus. “Many other university faculty senates across the state and student governments, including ours, who opposed it last year, have had an adamant opposition to these bills,” Pavelka said. “I strongly believe that right now the weapons are in the hands of the people that they need to be on campus— those being UPD,” she said. Pavelka said Student Government will also be discussing a possible resolution similar to what it passed last year, which opposed concealed carry on campus. “I was speaking to Jessica Scanlon (student body vice president) in the meeting and she said that they were willing to discuss the bill at an upcoming SG meeting,” Pavelka said. Chief StevenMoore said he is against the bills. “Basically, my opinion just comes down to that I don’t feel that having more guns will make it safe in the event of an active shooter,” Moore said. “My issue with it all is that having more people having guns in the day to day will result in more individual incidents. I’mjust not in favor.”

Moore said UPD officers are trained to respond in case of an active shooter.

“Of course, we hope we never have to use it, but we do train,” Moore said. “Lee County and airport police train with us, as well.”

Alexander Britton, an FGCU student, thinks the law could be positive if exercised correctly.

“I think there’s potential for it to be a good thing, but it’s impractical,” Britton said. “College students are typically irresponsible, immature, hormonal, dangerous and unfortunately, aggressive by nature — especially college guys. There would have to be some regulations standards as to who can get the license. They would need to go to safety training and mental evaluations. But like I said, the idea has potential as long as it’s done right.”

Amanda Putnik, FGCU student, does not support concealed firearms on campus, except for the parking lot.

“Guns shouldn’t belong on campus and in the classrooms,” Putnik said. “I do see some exceptions to this law in regards to the parking lot.”

Putnik said many incidences, such as the shooting that took place last week at a community college in Oregon, have occurred where students have carried weapons onto college campuses and caused several deaths and injuries.

“College should be a place where students feel safe to come and learn and achieve their goals and aspirations,” Putnik said. “If there were guns on campus, it would take away from college being a safe environment.”

Regarding the Oregon shooting, Pavelka said faculty senate discussed the tragedy and included it in the resolution. It also voted to send its condolences to the community college and to the victims’ families.

“The timing to discuss the bills was interesting,” Pavelka said. “Our campus is one of the safest in the country. I think that if the legislation passes it would change the campus culture.”

About The Author

Taylor Crehan

Taylor Crehan is the News Editor of Eagle News. She’s a sophomore majoring in journalism from Pembroke Pines, Florida. She loves spending time with friends and listening to music. When she’s not in the newsroom, she’s either quoting SpongeBob Squarepants or thinking about New York City.

4 Comments

  1. Avatar

    Notice that faculty and students are quoted as saying “feel” rather than “think” or “know” or “be safe.” They want to feel safe, even if the data indicate they are not. Even when several states allow concealed carry on school grounds with no ill effects. Even when this law applies only to those who are 21, have been photographed, fingerprinted, had a background check done, and gotten the required training.

    Do a web search for “Stopwatch of Death” as created by a law enforcement officer. TIME is the issue. A two-minute (very fast) response time by the police guarantees that many people will be shot. Only the people on the scene are the real first responders.

    These people would rather “feel” safe than actually BE safe.

    Higher learning doesn’t appear to be all that high here.

  2. Avatar

    When you need help now, police are just minutes away.

  3. Avatar

    Many of the very people she expressed concern about already have concealed carry permits. Is there a problem with carriers causing shootouts around the campus?

  4. Avatar

    It’s stunning, the abjectly ignorant, head-in-the-sand, live in condition white ALL the time, that many, if not most in academia have! Across the nation, concealed weapon permit holder have proven, PROVEN, themselves to be remarkably law abiding (commit crimes at 1/6th the rate of police) and remarkably accurate (shoot the wrong person at a rate lf 1/11th of the police) yet so many continue to ignore the FACTS and continue to insist on keeping “Defenseless Victim Zones” (incorrectly called “gun free zones”)! Why is that? WHY?

    Most places in the nation are NOT defenseless victim zones, yet the FACT that the vast, VAST, majority of mass murders occur in defenseless victim zones CANNOT BE A COINCIDENCE! CAN IT???

    The abject ignorance, stupidity, and stubborn refusal to look at these facts, again, is STUNNING!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

WINGS UP, LISTEN UP: Check out our brand-new Eagle Radio Station!

Latest Print Edition

Latest Crossword Answer

Advertisements

Recent from Instagram

Recent Tweets